The CLARITY Act Died Because Banks Have $6.6 Trillion Reasons to Kill It

0

Your savings account pays you less than 1%. Stablecoins want to pay you 4 to 5%. Last month, JPMorgan walked into the White House and handed negotiators a document demanding a complete ban on that.

Not a compromise. A ban.

That is not a regulatory dispute. That is JPMorgan protecting a spread at your expense.

What Happened

The CLARITY Act passed the House with bipartisan support in July 2025. It was supposed to be the bill that finally gave crypto a legal framework in the United States. By the time it reached the Senate Banking Committee, one question had swallowed everything else: should platforms like Coinbase and Kraken be allowed to offer yield to people who hold stablecoins like USDC?

The White House set a March 1 deadline to resolve it. Negotiators held three rounds of talks. At one session, officials collected everyone’s phones at the door to keep people in the room and focused. Banks showed up to every meeting with the same answer: ban yield entirely. Ban rewards. Ban bonuses. Ban any incentive at all for holding a stablecoin. And write enforcement provisions strong enough to prevent workarounds.

March 1 came and went. No deal. The Senate Banking Committee is now eyeing mid-to-late March for another attempt, with a soft July deadline after that before election-year politics consume the calendar.

What the Banks Are Protecting

Jamie Dimon made the case on CNBC. If you are paying yield on a balance, you are a bank, and you should be regulated like one. Capital requirements. FDIC insurance. Anti-money laundering rules. Community lending mandates. “If they want to be a bank, become a bank,” he said.

Dimon’s argument might have landed better if Kraken hadn’t just become the first crypto company in US history to secure direct access to the Federal Reserve’s payment systems through a master account. The Fed approved it. Kraken is becoming a bank. Dimon told them to and apparently didn’t expect anyone to take him seriously.

It sounds reasonable until you look at the numbers behind it. JPMorgan made $58 billion in profit last year. Bank of America made $27 billion. Wells Fargo made $19 billion. The gap between what banks earn on your money and what they pay you back is one of the most consistent wealth transfers in American finance. It runs every year, through every rate environment, regardless of who sits in the White House.

Brian Moynihan, BofA’s CEO, was more direct about what is actually at stake. He warned that up to $6.6 trillion in deposits could leave the banking system if yield-bearing stablecoins become widely available. That number is the honest version of the argument. It has nothing to do with systemic risk. It is about $6.6 trillion sitting in accounts earning next to nothing, and the question of whether it stays there.

Where It Stands

After the deadline collapsed, Trump posted on Truth Social: “Americans should earn more money on their money. The Banks are hitting record profits, and we are not going to allow them to undermine our powerful Crypto Agenda.” Eric Trump went further, calling out JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo by name.

Polymarket has passage odds at 72% for 2026. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse puts it higher, at 80 to 90% by late April. The math still favors the White House if it pushes hard enough.

But the banks have run this play before. Raise stability concerns. Demand the impossible. Wait for the calendar to run out. It worked on credit card rate caps earlier this year. They are trying it again here, with more money on the line.

The underlying dynamic is not complicated. A technology exists that could pay regular people real yield on their savings. The institutions that have profited from the gap between what they earn and what they pay have $6.6 trillion reasons to make sure that technology never gets the legal backing it needs to scale.

So far, it is working.


Sources:

Share.

About Author

Etan Hunt is a Bitcoin researcher, writer, and monetary reform advocate with over 5 years covering cryptocurrency markets, blockchain technology, and the economics of decentralised money. A committed Bitcoin maximalist, Etan believes the separation of money and state is as fundamental to human freedom as the separation of church and state — and writes from that conviction. His work on DailyCoinPost covers Bitcoin fundamentals, on-chain analysis, crypto security, and the evolving regulatory landscape. He has tracked multiple market cycles and written extensively on the macro case for sound money. Connect with Etan on LinkedIn or follow his coverage across DailyCoinPost.

Disclaimer: All content found on Dailycoinpost.com is only for informational purposes and should not be considered as financial advice. Do your own research before making any investment. Use information at your own risk.

Leave A Reply

As Featured In