Bitcoin

VP Harris’ Role in Crypto Regulation Raises Concerns Among Industry Experts

As the 2024 presidential election nears, crypto enthusiasts are keeping a close eye on potential leadership changes—and there’s growing speculation that a Kamala Harris presidency could bring stricter oversight to the digital currency space. Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, took to social media platform X to warn that Harris may not only continue but possibly intensify the regulatory efforts that the Biden administration has already undertaken.

Advisers With Anti-Crypto Views

Thorn’s main worry? Harris’ inner circle. The Vice President has reportedly brought on several key figures with a track record of opposing cryptocurrency, including Brian Deese and Bharat Ramamurti. These two were central to shaping the Biden administration’s approach to crypto, which many in the industry have found restrictive.

Earlier this year, Deese authored a blog post outlining the administration’s concerns about the risks posed by cryptocurrency. On the same day, the Federal Reserve made a controversial decision to deny Custodia Bank’s application for a master account—an event many in the industry saw as a calculated move to tighten the screws on crypto.

Additionally, Bharat Ramamurti has been a vocal critic of digital assets, working closely with other lawmakers like Senator Elizabeth Warren to scrutinize the industry.

Potential Impacts of a Harris Administration

If Kamala Harris is to become president, her administration could see Tim Walz as Vice President, further fueling worries that crypto regulation might not become any more favorable. Harris’ support for a corporate tax hike and policies targeting wealthy crypto holders also mirror current administration thinking, adding to concerns about a unified push to regulate digital currencies more strictly.

Experts like Thorn have called for a shift in Harris’ economic advisory team, recommending voices like Ro Khanna, Ritchie Torres, and Kirsten Gillibrand, who have shown more openness to blockchain technology.

Thorn sums up his concerns, saying that if figures like Brian Deese and Bharat Ramamurti are at the helm of economic policy in a potential Harris/Walz administration, the crypto community should prepare for continued, or even intensified, regulatory pressure.

Etan Hunt

Bitcoin Maximalist and Toxic to our banking and monetary system. Separation of money and state is necessary just like the separation of religion and state in the past.

Recent Posts

Many Central Banks Eyeing Rate Cuts: Could Bitcoin (BTC) Skyrocket to $250K?

It’s not just the Federal Reserve hinting at a shift towards looser monetary policy. Several…

1 day ago

Navigating the Future of Finance: Permissioned vs. Permissionless Blockchains

The global monetary system is at a critical juncture, as new technologies like decentralized finance…

7 days ago

UK Parliament Moves to Recognize Bitcoin and Crypto as Personal Property

In a significant step toward modernizing its legal framework, the UK Parliament has introduced the…

1 week ago

Will the Fed’s Rate Cut Shift the Balance in the ETH/BTC Trading Pair?

Ethereum's network has been experiencing a surge in growth, reaching levels not seen in months,…

1 week ago

AI Meets DeFi: How Artificial Intelligence is Revolutionizing Decentralized Finance

The world of decentralized finance (DeFi) has experienced rapid growth, with billions of dollars locked…

1 week ago

September Showdown: U.S. Lawmakers Take Steps to Clarify Crypto Regulations

As we step into September 2024, the crypto industry is poised at a pivotal juncture.…

1 week ago