Bitcoin

“The Times” claims that “Bitcoin and Ethereum are volatile because supply is controlled by those who hold the coins”

The article titled “Bank of England beefs up plans for digital ‘Britcoin’ currency” by The Times, published on April 5, 2021, includes a statement regarding Bitcoin and Ethereum’s volatility that requires fact-checking. The article claims that “Bitcoin and Ethereum are volatile because supply is controlled by those who hold the coins.”

This statement is not accurate  and it is misleading. While it is true that the supply of Bitcoin and Ethereum is limited, and that the market value of cryptocurrencies can be volatile, the volatility of these assets is primarily driven by demand and market forces, rather than the supply being controlled by those who hold the coins.

Bitcoin and Ethereum operate on a decentralized network, where supply is programmed into the protocol and is not controlled by any single entity or individual. The total supply of Bitcoin is limited to 21 million, and the supply of Ethereum is limited by an annual cap on the amount of new tokens that can be created through mining. The limited supply of both cryptocurrencies is a deliberate design feature, intended to prevent inflation and maintain the value of the currency over time.

However, the volatility of cryptocurrencies is primarily driven by factors such as market demand, regulatory changes, and media coverage, rather than the supply being controlled by those who hold the coins. For example, the value of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies can be affected by factors such as changes in government regulations, media coverage, and market speculation.

It is also worth noting that the supply of cryptocurrencies can be influenced by mining, which is the process by which new coins are created and added to the blockchain. However, the mining process is open to anyone with the required computing power, and the rewards for mining are controlled by the protocol, rather than any single entity or individual.

In summary, the claim made in the article that “Bitcoin and Ethereum are volatile because supply is controlled by those who hold the coins” is not accurate. While the supply of cryptocurrencies is limited, the market value of these assets is primarily driven by demand and market forces, rather than the supply being controlled by those who hold the coins.

Etan Hunt

Bitcoin Maximalist and Toxic to our banking and monetary system. Separation of money and state is necessary just like the separation of religion and state in the past.

Recent Posts

Empowering Entrepreneurs: How LayerK Supports Innovative Ideas

In today’s fast-paced world, entrepreneurship is more accessible than ever, but turning a brilliant idea…

3 weeks ago

Clayton – Mascot of the Ton ecosystem

The TON blockchain ecosystem is rapidly gaining momentum, and this month marks the launch of…

1 month ago

Many Central Banks Eyeing Rate Cuts: Could Bitcoin (BTC) Skyrocket to $250K?

It’s not just the Federal Reserve hinting at a shift towards looser monetary policy. Several…

2 months ago

Navigating the Future of Finance: Permissioned vs. Permissionless Blockchains

The global monetary system is at a critical juncture, as new technologies like decentralized finance…

2 months ago

UK Parliament Moves to Recognize Bitcoin and Crypto as Personal Property

In a significant step toward modernizing its legal framework, the UK Parliament has introduced the…

2 months ago

Will the Fed’s Rate Cut Shift the Balance in the ETH/BTC Trading Pair?

Ethereum's network has been experiencing a surge in growth, reaching levels not seen in months,…

2 months ago